Leaf water potential and osmotic adjustment as physiological traits to improve drought tolerance in rice

A sample of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) was derived from a bi-parental cross between Lemont and BK88-BR6, which contrasted in maintenance of leaf water potential (LWP) and expression of osmotic adjustment (OA). Genotypic variation for LWP and OA, and their associations with yield determination under water deficit, was studied in a series of five field experiments. Genotypic variation in the maintenance of high LWP was consistent across water deficit experiments. In the determination of genotypic variation in the maintenance of LWP, rate of water deficit was not an important factor influencing ranking, but degree of water deficit, and phenological development stage were important, particularly around heading. Genotypic variation in expression of OA was also observed under water deficits during both vegetative and flowering stages but ranking was inconsistent across experiments. This was in part because of large experimental errors associated with its measurement, but also because the expression of OA was associated with extent of decline of LWP. The relationship between OA and LWP was demonstrated when data were combined across experiments for vegetative and flowering stages. Under water-limited conditions around flowering, grain yield reduction was mainly due to a increased spikelet sterility. Variation in OA was not related to grain yield nor yield components. There were however, negative phenotypic and genetic correlations between LWP and percentage spikelet sterility measured at flowering stage on panicles at the same development stage during a water deficit treatment. This suggests that traits contributing to the maintenance of high LWP minimized the effects of water deficit on spikelet sterility and consequently grain yield. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

Screening for drought resistance in rainfed lowland rice

In this review, reasons for the slow progress in development of drought resistant cultivars for rainfed lowland rice are considered first. Recent advances in screening methods for development of drought resistant cultivars from mostly our research in Thailand in the 1990s, are then described for drought that develops early or late in the wet-season. There now appears to be a good prospect for developing drought resistant cultivars that produce higher yield than existing cultivars when drought develops late in the wet-season. Appropriate phenology to escape late-season drought and high potential yield under well-watered conditions are important characters for cultivars adapted to rainfed lowland conditions. In addition, ability to maintain higher leaf water potential when drought develops late in the season is another desirable character. Maintenance of leaf water potential just prior to flowering is associated with higher panicle water potential, reduced delay in flowering time, and reduced spikelet sterility, and hence contributes to higher yield. Genotypes that are adapted to areas of late-season drought should also have high harvest index, intermediate height and rather small total dry matter compared to existing traditional cultivars, under well-watered conditions. This combination of characters would ensure high potential yield under favourable conditions and also contribute to resistance against late-season drought. Screening against early-season drought that develops during the vegetative stage is more difficult, as the genotype's ability to recover from the stress appears more important than drought tolerance during the stress period. Other than appropriate phenology, high potential yield and ability to maintain high leaf water potential, no specific physiological and morphological characters appear to contribute directly to higher yield under drought conditions in rainfed lowland rice in Thailand, where drought develops rather rapidly due to the prevailing coarse textured soils. It is thus appropriate to develop a breeding program that is primarily based on selection for grain yield. There are large genotype by environment interactions for yield in rainfed lowland rice and hence it is important that genotypes are selected for yield under appropriate target environments. Addition of a drought screening program that is conducted in the field in the wet-season to the overall breeding program would enhance the opportunity to select for drought resistance within the breeding materials and increase the chance of developing high yielding cultivars adapted to the drought-prone rainfed lowland environments. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

Improving drought tolerance in rainfed lowland rice: an example from Thailand

A large portion of the world’s poor farm in rainfed systems where the water supply is unpredictable and droughts are common. In Thailand there are approximately 6.2 million ha of rain fed lowland rice which account for 67% of the country’s total rice-growing area. This rice system is often characterised by too much and too little water in the same season. Farmers’ estimates of their annual losses to drought are as high as 45% in the upper parts of the toposequence. In contrast to irrigated rice systems, gains from crop improvement of rainfed rice have been modest, in part because there has been little effort to breed and select for drought tolerance for the target rainfed environments. The crop improvement strategy being used in Thailand considers three mechanisms that influence yield in the drought prone targets: yield potential as an important mechanism for mild drought (where yield loss is less than 50%), drought escape (appropriate phenology) and drought tolerance traits of leaf water potential, sterility, flower delay and drought response index for more severe drought conditions. Genotypes are exposed to managed drought environments for selection of drought tolerant genotypes. A marker assisted selection (MAS) scheme has been developed and applied for selection of progenies in the backcrossing program. The plant breeding program uses rapid generation advance techniques that enable early yield testing in the target population of environments (TPE) through inter-station (multi-location yield testing) and on-farm trials. A farmer participatory approach has been used to identify the TPE for the breeding program. Four terrace paddy levels have been identified, upper (drought), middle (drought prone to favorable) and lower (flooded). This paper reports the change in the breeding program for the drought prone rainfed lowland rice environments of North and Northeast Thailand by incorporating our knowledge on adaptation and on response of rice to drought

Genotypic variation in grain yield and flowering pattern in terminal and intermittent drought screening methods in rainfed lowland rice

Rainfed lowland rice in the Mekong region is mostly grown in drought-prone areas, and drought resistant varieties could be selected using either terminal drought (severe water stress after flowering) or intermittent drought (frequent mild stress) screening. Delay in flowering is considered as a putative trait for selection of drought resistant genotypes, and its effectiveness as an indirect selection trait and its association with genotype's flowering duration, i.e. the time taken from the first to last flower in a plot, was evaluated under the two drought screening methods. These screening methods together with flood control were used at two locations, Chum Phae and Ubon in north-east Thailand using a total of 70 genotypes with different growing duration. Delay in flowering was estimated for the two drought screening methods and flowering of individual panicles within a plot was recorded to determine flowering duration of each genotype in the flood and terminal drought conditions.Mean reduction in grain yield was 52-55% under the terminal drought screening while it was 10-19% for the whole population and 23-33% for early flowering genotypes in the intermittent drought. Delay in flowering under intermittent drought condition at both locations was associated with yield reduction; genotypes that exhibited shorter delay in flowering had smaller yield reduction percentage and larger number of panicles. At Chum Phae, where grain yield reduction was associated with flowering time, genotypes with longer flowering duration under terminal drought had smaller yield reduction, and this was found even among genotypes that flowered about the same time under flood condition. However, there was no association between delay in flowering and flowering duration. It is concluded that delay in flowering appears promising as a selection criterion under intermittent drought conditions, provided a higher yield reduction can be achieved for example by using an increased irrigation interval